The jury has reached a verdict in the second murder trial of Karen Read, but over their several days of deliberations, they sent some questions to the judge.
In one, jurors asked: “If we find not guilty on two charges but can’t agree on one charge, is it a hung jury on all three charges, or just one charge?”
Judge Beverly Cannone — who said the defense at first wanted her to ignore the question entirely — indicated that would be premature. She decided, over the defense’s objections, to send jurors a note saying, “This is a theoretical question, not a question I can answer.”
Read has pleaded not guilty to second-degree murder, vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated and leaving the scene of an accident resulting in death.
The last trial: After Read’s first trial ended with a hung jury, her defense attorneys claimed several jurors had come forward to say they had unanimously found Read not guilty of the murder and leaving the scene counts, and had deadlocked only on the charge of vehicular manslaughter.
Some of the other questions included:
-
“What is the time frame for the OUI charge? Offense 002, Section 5 — OUI at 12:45 a.m. or OUI at 5 a.m.?” the jury asked. OUI stands for operating under the influence. After discussing the time frame for the charge with attorneys on both sides, Cannone settled on telling jurors: “You are the fact finders.”
-
“Are video clips of Karen’s interviews evidence? How can we consider them?” the jury asked. The judge answered, “Yes, the videos are evidence.”
-
The jury also asked, “Does convicting guilty on a sub charge — example, offense two, number five — convict the overall charge?” Cannone brought the jurors back into the courtroom and walked them through an amended version of the verdict slip agreed upon by both parties.